South Carolina Rep. Looks to Limit Payday Loans Per Customer
State Rep. Michael Thompson says it’s not the fees associated with South Carolina payday loans driving people into debt, it’s the number of loans they are taking out at one time.
Legislation that Rep. Thompson proposed this week would limit consumers’ borrowing to no more than $300 in 60 days and no more than six payday loans in a year. Cash advance companies also would have to grant customers a six-month repayment grace period with no charge and offer repayment plans to borrowers who can’t immediately pay back their loan.
“These things were never supposed to be a permanent fix in someone’s financial world,” Rep. Thompson said. “These were supposed to be a temporary fix for someone’s financial situation.”
House Bill 3831 would establish a statewide database to track consumers’ payday cash loans so borrowers couldn’t take loans from several different payday lenders at once.
Florida uses a similar database to regulate cash advance loans, Rep. Thompson said.
According to his bill, a fee of no more than $1 per loan would cover the cost of maintaining the database. The database would be established and operated by an outside company and the Board of Financial Institutions would oversee the system.
Companies that don’t comply with the faxless payday advance limits could face a $2,500 fine per South Carolina location, regardless of whether each store violated the law, according to the bill.
Payday lenders would have their license revoked for two years on the second offense. Consumer advocates are backing the measure, but industry representatives say it punishes responsible borrowers.
Jamie Fulmer, director of investor relations at Spartanburg-based Advance America, said his company is willing to work with legislators in creating “reasonable regulations.” But “arbitrary” caps aren’t an effective way to protect people who misuse their services, Mr. Fulmer said.
Without short-term, bad credit payday loan options, people are faced with paying bills late, bouncing a check or using an unregulated offshore Internet lender, he said.
James Wood, owner of Anderson Quick Cash, said his customers who rewrite loans do so because they are still working through a financial problem. But they stop coming in when they get back on their feet.
“The majority of customers, it’s not a lifelong thing like people think,” Mr. Wood said.

Banning it would be the best answer, but lawmakers don’t seem willing to do that. The only compromise should be in favor of a bill that would cut the usurious 391 percent annualized rate lenders can now charge to 36 percent.
Bratton sent a lower-ranking staffer to today’s meeting, and the staffer said he is no longer involved with
Legitimate banks allow you to buy a $2 candy bar with your debit card but don’t tell you your account has already been overdrawn. And they charge you $20 to $35 for that purchase - even though they can simply decide to not let you make it.
Shamefully, South Carolina law allows these lenders to charge fees that amount to an annual interest rate of 391 percent. Many of the borrowers who end up paying the outlandish interest are the poor, the elderly and minorities.
Here are the facts: There is a need for short-term, unsecured credit. People living paycheck-to-paycheck have an occasional need for emergency cash. Options are limited. If you lack collateral, banks won’t give you a loan. Period.